Hate much Dan? Or just hoping someone will oblige you?

Don't worry, everyone knows it's just you infamous liberal wit(less).

FYI the NRA does with candidates that support their agenda (there's that word you don't quite grasp again) be it Democrat or Republican, always have. Only a nimrod, or someone that writes articles like this one, would assume members would vote in lockstep. Those "Teabagger's, clinging to their guns and religion, might though, right? LOL Nice try.

I think dumb ass is fishing for a date.

I don't know, seems strange enough to me.

Well actually, Nitro, how often do you believe that dems earn the endorsement of the NRA?  And how often does it involve what's considered a 'key' election for the gop? 

I'm just curious if you've been able to miss the point....yet again. 

Teabaggers....lol.  The loony left and their sayings.

Dan you must be an idiot that fell off the turnip truck yesterday. Many people have joined the anti-gun movement in the last 20 years or so and as expected the Democratic Party jumps in to suck up their votes. They try to please all, and end up pleasing few as usual. Yet not all Democrats fall in line with the pied pipers of the anti-gun movement. We can only be grateful there are still many that believe in the constitution. The NRA will side with those that advance their cause. Tell me do you see everything in red and blue?

But don't take it from me Dan (that might hurt your over inflated ego), this is from the NRA.

"Today, NRA enjoys the support of a narrow pro-gun majority in the House. While the Democratic leadership in the House is anti-gun, their majority is due, in no small part, to the election of pro-gun Democrats over the past two elections. Many of these recently elected Democrats are important allies who deserve NRA members` support."

Linky

Ah the superiority complexes of the elitists... how charming.  The point is members will typically vote their conscience, which may or may not be in line with the organization. You can sensationalize it all you want. I bet you can't believe BP gave more campaign contributions to oil-is-bad Obama than to drill-baby-drill McCain either?

I know this might be a difficult concept for you to grasp, since you're not a conservative, but Liberals and progressives will not look at others outside of their narrow partisan view of how they believe things should be, even if someone outside their circle wants the same thing. It's too demeaning for them. Conservatives will. 

You are unbelievably stupid.  Seriously.  Do you have a job?  I'm just curious.  what is it?  Does it involve thinking?  Reading?  Writing?  Do you clean bathrooms?  What is it?  I can't even fathom how somebody who really is as dense as you could possibly survive in a professional environment for longer than a few moments. 

Look:  the NRA is largely perceived as a GOP leaning organization.  Are you going to tell me that this perception doesn't exist?  What color is the sky in the world where you live? 

YEAH YEAH ELITIST YEAH YEAH OLBERMAN YEAH YEAH LIB-RUH AIR AMERICA COMMUNIST. 

Do your knuckles bleed from constant dragging? 

Um.  Yes.  In fact, I'm aware of the political contributions for any company that I own shares in.  BP is no exception. 

Maybe that's your problem Dan. Isn't your crowd all about "Yes we can"?

Ah the insecure little prick wants to compare technical penises, how pathetic. You're the moron that comes strolling into a tech related companies blogsite and assume others, you don't know in the least bit, of being less technical than yourself. What a huge ego you have Dan. It just makes you look small and amateurish. Of course we know you are "speed sheet" boy, Walmart must be proud of you, congradulations. I'm far comfortable enough in my knowledge to not feel the need to justify it to the likes of you. 

Does the truth make your ears bleed? Rule 5 from your hero back at you Dan.

Nobody here gives a damn what you own. You don't get it do you Dan? You're no better than anyone else here. Does it make you feel self-important to mention it?

For readers that want to hear NRA policy from the NRA, and not a partisan left wing loon trying to stir the pot, read it here.

What crowd? 

Nitro, come on dude.  We know that you're not technical.  You're not smart enough to be technical.

YEAH YEAH ALINSKI!!  OBAMACARE DEATHPANEL PINKO!

You know the funny thing is:  I've read Alinsky.  You haven't.  I make that assumption because: 

1.  As you've admitted:  reading isn't your bit

2.  Not in any rational person's fantasy am I even in the same zipcode as Saul Alinsky. 

Nitro:  you brought it up.  You said: 

"I bet you can't believe BP gave more campaign contributions to oil-is-bad Obama than to drill-baby-drill McCain either?"

"Um. Yes. In fact, I'm aware of the political contributions for any company that I own shares in. BP is no exception."

Don't like it?  Don't comment. 

Teabagger, if you own BP stock your not as smart as you think you are.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/16/bank-america-reportedly-reins-trades-bp/

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/goldman_great_timing_for_unloading_wEe19Ge1RQRQNUeCvOVdYI

http://www.businessinsider.com/goldmans-great-timing-for-unloading-bp-stock-2010-6

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/11/bp-deathwatch-tony-hayward-saved-857k-by-selling-shares-weeks/

Some people knew the blowout was coming, you did not.

I think these are the 2 pull quotes as you would say.  The NRA has never been a "republican" organization (they have endorsed many a democrat in the past).  They are a lobbying group that seeks to advance their own agenda and will support the candidate they see as will do the most good for them.  Clearly they think Reid is that candidate in that election.  So the problem is where?

It also demonstrates a lot more intelligence than other lobbying groups.  That have aligned themselves so closely with one party that they have lost all clout.  In other words, if they do not get what they want, they have no place to go.  That is stupid, but then no one said most one party lobbying groups had any Mensa candidates in them.

I would start here Dan.  It might provide some enlightenment for you

Small mind Dan, sad really. A man with mental powers so great that he knows others, whom he never met, technical capabilities so well to make assumptions, yet holds BP stock while it tanks. What amazing psychic powers. The Mystery Men might need another member.

It's really killing you to know, isn't it Dan? Professionals not looking for a job, need not boast about their skills here. But in all seriousness Dan, there are more than a few members on JU that would put you to shame. Possibly a few that you regularly dismiss with your colorful wit. 

BTW Who is "We", do you have a rat in your pocket? Oh, you mean you and your huge ego...got it.

Post my quote saying "reading isn't my thing". You asked if my kids read, and since they are grown and no longer live with me, I said I'd have to ask them. That's about the only "reading" comment I recall. But you can set me straight right now. Another lie Dan? Really, am I to believe anything you say? Is your employer aware of your blatant dishonesty?

I didn't ask what you own, nor did I "bring up" ownership... you felt the need to add that bit, like it impresses people or something. A simple "I'm aware of BP campaign funding" would have sufficed (although the question was sarcasm to begin with). You can say you own anything, it's unverifiable, uninteresting, so it's irrelevant (like most of your comments), it might impress small minds. Big Dan is someone.... there, feel special now?

Come on Dan.... that from a guy that likes to mock??? Pretty weak. Besides I like everything you say, most is crap, but what the hey.

Fellas, dan_l is simply rude, condescending and totally uninterested in 'discussion'.  Time to ignore his pathetic efforts at provocation & move on to more rewarding intellectual pursuits, like, say, watching grass grow.

Daiwa. you're probably right. But it's really up to Dan. I'll answer a personal attack (difference of opinion is fine, always has been) levied against me, as well as any crude slight or ridicule, direct or indirect, with the intent to marginalize or stifle the rights of others to comment. I suppose I can play rough too. Now, it's starting to get old. Spirited debate or commentary is good.  So, we'll see how it works out... for now.