Tech, politics, sports, and the overuse of ellipses...
Published on July 4, 2010 By dan_l In Blogging

Huffpo's front page right now has a gigantic picture of Steele with a link that says "War Within the GOP". Link goes to this:

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) the beloved libertarian, former presidential candidate and longtime skeptic of foreign military entanglements, put out a statement on Sunday congratulating Steele for having the courage to, as he put it, tell the truth on the Afghan war:

I would like to congratulate Michael Steele for his leadership on one of the most important issues of today. He is absolutely right: Afghanistan is now Obama's war. During the 2008 campaign, Obama was out in front in insisting that more troops be sent to Afghanistan. Obama called for expanding the war even as he pretended to be a peace candidate.

Michael Steele should not resign. Smart policies make smart politics. He is guiding the party in the right direction and we are on the verge of victory this fall. Chairman Steele should not back off. He is giving the country, especially young people, hope as he speaks truth about this war.

I have to ask myself, what is the agenda of the harsh critics demanding this resignation? Why do they support Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama's war?

The American people are sick and tired spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year, draining our economy and straining our military. Michael Steele has it right and Republicans should stick by him.

Paul's statement, of course, doesn't take into consideration that Steele and the RNC have put out at least two separate statements clarifying his remark -- essentially walking it back. If he's congratulating Steele for speaking truth to power, he's roughly two days late.

Now granted, regardless of who you are if you're not a paultard and you're not the half of the teaparty that runs little l, you probably recognize that Paul is on the outer edge of the mainstream GOP at best---fringe at worst. Still though, you have to figure:

1. The math has been done already. There are 'quite a few' people who are prone to supporting Paul---vehemently.

2. If Paul gets by with this one, you wonder what other GOP types might turn.


Comments
on Jul 06, 2010

On this issue, Paul is more in line with the democrats than most republicans. (the war, not Steele).  I would have been surprised if he had not backed Steele.

on Jul 06, 2010

But uhhh, doncha think it's going to be a little bit more difficult to blast Steele with Paul supporting the idea----on it's face? 

on Jul 07, 2010

dan_l
But uhhh, doncha think it's going to be a little bit more difficult to blast Steele with Paul supporting the idea----on it's face? 

For who to blast Steele?  Republicans?  Some have so I do not see how "difficult" it has been.  Democrats?  Well, we know that one don't we?

on Jul 10, 2010

Republicans? Some have so I do not see how "difficult" it has been.

But certainly the calls for his resignation have quieted, right? 

on Jul 12, 2010

dan_l

Republicans? Some have so I do not see how "difficult" it has been.
But certainly the calls for his resignation have quieted, right? 

I do not know.  The ones I heard yelling for him to resign still are.  But it was not a universal call, so others have not taken it up.  He still has a powerful base (the way MacAuliff did and why he lasted through all his debacles).

on Jul 12, 2010

Steele is right... just the other day 6 more soldiers were lost to this quagmire in Afghanistan. I've grown tired of Obama's misguided and criminal wars. All these guys are dying and he just doesn't care because he is heartless and cruel. His use of predator drones to annihilate innocent families in Afghanistan have been particularly appalling, and I also suspect that he has used white phosphorous on these poor people. These cruel weapons would never be used on white Europeans... only the poor brown people Obama has vanquished as a war criminal.